Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Goldshell X5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Specification | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 850.0 MH/s |
| 5,676 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 172,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,705,882.4 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 4,600.0 kg |
| 19,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Goldshell X5
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 3782% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell X5 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell X5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 3782% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell X5 74% better power draw (5,676 vs 1,450 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 90% better efficacité (172,000 vs 1,705,882 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 291% more heat output (19,367 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 42% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Metric | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| $16,888 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$13.62 | Daily net profit | -$3.48 |
| -$21,860 | Net after 1 year | -$2,470 |
| -$26,831 | Net after 2 years | -$3,740 |
| -$31,803 | Net after 3 years | -$5,011 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)172,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Goldshell X5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell X5 is more profitable at $-3.48/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Goldshell X5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell X5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Goldshell X5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell X5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell X5?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell X5 runs at 1,705,882.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,533,882.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficacité (172,000 vs 1,705,882 J/TH).