Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 GH/s |
| 800 W | Consommation électrique | 3,360 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 210,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh), which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 3075% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 3075% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 76% better power draw (800 vs 3,360 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 87% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 210,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 320% more heat output (2,730 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,199 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$8.06 |
| -$866 | Net after 1 year | -$6,142 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 2 years | -$9,085 |
| -$2,267 | Net after 3 years | -$12,028 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,377,301.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 210,000 J/TH).