Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 TH/s |
| 2,880 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 11,400.0 kg |
| 9,827 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Based on BTC price of $77,872 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 31% better efficacité (45.0 vs 65.0 J/TH). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 28% more hashrate (64.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 11% better power draw (2,880 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 31% better efficacité (45.0 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 8% better weight (10,500 vs 11,400 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 13% more heat output (9,827 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,255 |
| -$4.62 | Daily net profit | -$6.01 |
| -$6,835 | Net after 1 year | -$3,448 |
| -$8,521 | Net after 2 years | -$5,641 |
| -$10,206 | Net after 3 years | -$7,834 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) is more profitable at $-4.62/day compared to $-6.01/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (45.0 vs 65.0 J/TH).