Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 95.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.5 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 34.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 126.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 3,800.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 726% more hashrate (95.0 vs 11.5 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 726% more hashrate (95.0 vs 11.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 55% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,450 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 73% better efficacité (34.2 vs 126.1 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 74% better weight (14,500 vs 3,800 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 124% more heat output (11,089 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $215 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$3.07 |
| -$1,815 | Net after 1 year | -$2,074 |
| -$3,414 | Net after 2 years | -$3,193 |
| -$5,014 | Net after 3 years | -$4,313 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.07/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH — a difference of 91.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (34.2 vs 126.1 J/TH).