Antminer S19 Hydro vs Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 158.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 5,451 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 34.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 36.1 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.2 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 18,599 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Hydro
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S19 Hydro, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 76% more hashrate (158.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 Hydro and Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 Hydro 76% more hashrate (158.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 40% better power draw (5,451 vs 3,250 W)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 4% better efficacité (34.5 vs 36.1 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 100% better weight (15.2 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 68% more heat output (18,599 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 100% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $405 |
| -$7.40 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$7,702 | Net after 1 year | -$2,071 |
| -$10,403 | Net after 2 years | -$3,737 |
| -$13,105 | Net after 3 years | -$5,403 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 HydroScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Hydro34.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S19 Hydro or Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) is more profitable at $-4.56/day compared to $-7.40/day for the Antminer S19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19 Hydro or the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S19 Hydro is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 Hydro or Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)?
The Antminer S19 Hydro scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19 Hydro and Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer S19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) runs at 36.1 J/TH — a difference of 1.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficacité (34.5 vs 36.1 J/TH).