Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Whatsminer M60S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M60S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 220.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,960 W |
| 36.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,512 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Whatsminer M60S++
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M60S++ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 144% more hashrate (90.0 vs 220.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) and Whatsminer M60S++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M60S++ 144% more hashrate (90.0 vs 220.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 18% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,960 W)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 50% better efficacité (36.1 vs 18.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 22% more heat output (11,089 vs 13,512 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M60S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $405 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,000 |
| -$4.56 | Daily net profit | -$1.59 |
| -$2,071 | Net after 1 year | -$7,582 |
| -$3,737 | Net after 2 years | -$8,164 |
| -$5,403 | Net after 3 years | -$8,746 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60S++Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S++18.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Whatsminer M60S++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S++ is more profitable at $-1.59/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) or Whatsminer M60S++?
The Whatsminer M60S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) or the Whatsminer M60S++?
The Whatsminer M60S++ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) and Whatsminer M60S++?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) runs at 36.1 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH — a difference of 18.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficacité (36.1 vs 18.0 J/TH).