MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Whatsminer M60S++ is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 6 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs 33.0 TH/s at 65 J/TH; the Whatsminer M60S++ runs 220.0 TH/s at 18 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M60S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 220.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 3,960 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8.6 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,512 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M60S++
Based on BTC price of $65,075 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M60S++, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 567% more hashrate (33.0 vs 220.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M60S++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60S++ 567% more hashrate (33.0 vs 220.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 46% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,960 W)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 72% better efficacité (65.0 vs 18.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 39% better weight (8.6 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S++ 85% more heat output (7,319 vs 13,512 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M60S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,000 |
| -$4.07 | Daily net profit | -$2.30 |
| -$3,985 | Net after 1 year | -$7,840 |
| -$5,469 | Net after 2 years | -$8,679 |
| -$6,954 | Net after 3 years | -$9,519 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M10Score: 11/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S++18.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S++ is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-4.07/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M60S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S++: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Whatsminer M60S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M60S++?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH — a difference of 47.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (65.0 vs 18.0 J/TH).