Bitmain Antminer S7-LN vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S7-LN | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.0 TH/s |
| 697 W | Consommation électrique | 1,300 W |
| 258.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 100.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7,500.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 2,378 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,436 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S7-LN
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,885 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 381% more hashrate (2.7 vs 13.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 381% more hashrate (2.7 vs 13.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 46% better power draw (697 vs 1,300 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 61% better efficacité (258 vs 100 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 44% better weight (7,500 vs 4,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 87% more heat output (2,378 vs 4,436 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 3% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S7-LN | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$1.58 | Daily net profit | -$2.66 |
| -$576 | Net after 1 year | -$1,036 |
| -$1,151 | Net after 2 years | -$2,007 |
| -$1,727 | Net after 3 years | -$2,978 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)100.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S7-LN vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN is more profitable at $-1.58/day compared to $-2.66/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S7-LN and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN runs at 258.2 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH — a difference of 158.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (258 vs 100 J/TH).