Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 1,728 W | Consommation électrique | 1,400 W |
| 96.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 5,150.0 kg | Weight | 0.7 kg |
| 5,896 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,777 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 350% more hashrate (18.0 vs 4.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 350% more hashrate (18.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 19% better power draw (1,728 vs 1,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 73% better efficacité (96.0 vs 350.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 100% better weight (5,150.0 vs 0.7 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 23% more heat output (5,896 vs 4,777 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 136% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $149 |
| -$3.51 | Daily net profit | -$3.22 |
| -$1,281 | Net after 1 year | -$1,324 |
| -$2,562 | Net after 2 years | -$2,498 |
| -$3,844 | Net after 3 years | -$3,673 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)96.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or Canaan Avalon Nano 3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is more profitable at $-3.22/day compared to $-3.51/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) runs at 96.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 254.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (96.0 vs 350.0 J/TH).