Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 32.0 TH/s |
| 1,450 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 126.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 68.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 4,947 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T
Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 178% more hashrate (11.5 vs 32.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 178% more hashrate (11.5 vs 32.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 34% better power draw (1,450 vs 2,200 W)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 45% better efficacité (126.1 vs 68.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 49% better weight (3,800 vs 7,500 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T 52% more heat output (4,947 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 19% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,266 |
| -$3.07 | Daily net profit | -$4.13 |
| -$2,074 | Net after 1 year | -$2,773 |
| -$3,193 | Net after 2 years | -$4,280 |
| -$4,313 | Net after 3 years | -$5,787 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T68.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.07/day compared to $-4.13/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T runs at 68.8 J/TH — a difference of 57.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (126.1 vs 68.8 J/TH).
Compare Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo+ 32T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator