Avalon A1346 vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 7,200 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M63, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 227% more hashrate (110 vs 360 TH/s). That said, the Avalon A1346 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1346 and Whatsminer M63 sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M63 227% more hashrate (110 vs 360 TH/s)
- Avalon A1346 54% better power draw (3,300 vs 7,200 W)
- Whatsminer M63 33% better efficacité (30.0 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Avalon A1346 55% better weight (12.3 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 118% more heat output (11,260 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | -$4.33 |
| -$4,247 | Net after 1 year | -$12,582 |
| -$5,694 | Net after 2 years | -$14,164 |
| -$7,141 | Net after 3 years | -$15,746 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6320.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1346 or Whatsminer M63 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1346 is more profitable at $-3.96/day compared to $-4.33/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1346 or the Whatsminer M63 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Avalon A1346 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1346 vs Whatsminer M63: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1346). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1346 vs Whatsminer M63: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 10.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (30.0 vs 20.0 J/TH).