Avalon A1566 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1566 | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| 185.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,799 W |
| 18.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,962 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1566
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 42% more hashrate (185 vs 262 TH/s). The Avalon A1566 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1566 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 42% more hashrate (185 vs 262 TH/s)
- Avalon A1566 10% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,799 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 22% better efficacité (18.5 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Avalon A1566 42% better weight (14.9 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 11% more heat output (11,669 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1566 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1566 | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.55 | Daily net profit | $0.31 |
| -$6,066 | Net after 1 year | +$114 |
| -$6,631 | Net after 2 years | +$228 |
| -$7,197 | Net after 3 years | +$341 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72$1.86/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1566Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7214.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1566 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $0.31/day compared to $-1.55/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1566 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Avalon A1566 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1566 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 on J/TH?
The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 4.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficacité (18.5 vs 14.5 J/TH).