Canaan Avalon A16 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A16 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 282.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,900 W | Consommation électrique | 1,400 W |
| 13.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 0.7 kg |
| 13,307 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,777 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A16
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 6950% more hashrate (282.0 vs 4.0 TH/s). The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon A16 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A16 6950% more hashrate (282.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 64% better power draw (3,900 vs 1,400 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 96% better efficacité (13.8 vs 350.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 95% better weight (14.9 vs 0.7 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16 179% more heat output (13,307 vs 4,777 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 120% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon A16 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $4,202 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $149 |
| $0.79 | Daily net profit | -$3.22 |
| -$3,915 | Net after 1 year | -$1,323 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 2 years | -$2,497 |
| -$3,340 | Net after 3 years | -$3,671 |
| Takes ~14.6 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16$4.00/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A16 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $0.79/day compared to $-3.22/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan Avalon A16 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A16 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan Avalon A16 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A16 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 336.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (13.8 vs 350.0 J/TH).