Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Taux de hachage 6.6 TH/s Puissance 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
Goldshell CK Box II

Goldshell CK Box II

Taux de hachage 2.1 TH/s Puissance 400 W Efficiency 190.5 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs Goldshell CK Box II

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification Goldshell CK Box II
6.6 TH/s Taux de hachage 2.1 TH/s
2,400 W Consommation électrique 400 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 190.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
9,900.0 kg Weight 3.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,365 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000286 BTC $0.21
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.55
Monthly -$166.40
Yearly -$2,024.50

Goldshell CK Box II

Daily Revenue 0.00000091 BTC $0.07
Daily Electricity -$0.96
Daily Profit -$0.89
Monthly -$26.76
Yearly -$325.61

Based on BTC price of $74,612 and current network difficulty as of Mar 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK Box II l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Le iBeLink BM-N1 a l'avantage en hashrate. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.

Winner: Goldshell CK Box II — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell CK Box II

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK Box II

190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink BM-N1 or Goldshell CK Box II more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Box II is more profitable at $-0.89/day compared to $-5.55/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N1 or Goldshell CK Box II?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N1 or Goldshell CK Box II?

The Goldshell CK Box II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N1 and Goldshell CK Box II?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 173.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.