iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 30.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 110.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.6 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3 Max
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-N3 Max edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 150% more hashrate (30.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell CK5 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Goldshell CK5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 150% more hashrate (30.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK5 27% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 45% better efficacité (110 vs 200 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 100% better weight (6.6 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 38% more heat output (11,260 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$6.84 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$2,497 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$4,994 | Net after 2 years | -$4,888 |
| -$7,490 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N3 MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3 Max110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK5 is more profitable at $-5.33/day compared to $-6.84/day for the iBeLink BM-N3 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the Goldshell CK5?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Goldshell CK5?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max runs at 110.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 90.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (110 vs 200 J/TH).