IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 300% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.4 TH/s) in the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 300% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 35% better power draw (65.0 vs 100.0 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 62% better efficacité (650 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 54% more heat output (222 vs 341 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.23/day for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (650 vs 250 J/TH).