IceRiver KS1 vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS3M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 500% more hashrate (1.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS1 and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 500% more hashrate (1.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 82% better power draw (600 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 6% better efficacité (600 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3M 4% better weight (15.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 467% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS1 or the IceRiver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS1 or the IceRiver KS3M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS1 or IceRiver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS1 and IceRiver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 33.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (600 vs 567 J/TH).