IceRiver KS1 vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 375.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KA BOX Pro, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% more hashrate (1.0 vs 1.6 TH/s). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS1 and Goldshell KA BOX Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 60% more hashrate (1.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 38% better efficacité (600 vs 375 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 15% better noise (65.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 14% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$1.38 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$634 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$1,138 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$1,643 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX Pro375.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS1 or the Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-1.40/day for the IceRiver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS1 vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the IceRiver KS1 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS1 vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the IceRiver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS1 and Goldshell KA BOX Pro on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH — a difference of 225.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (600 vs 375 J/TH).