IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS2 | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS2
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS3M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 200% more hashrate (2.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS2 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS2 and Iceriver KS3M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS3M 200% more hashrate (2.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 65% better power draw (1,200 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 6% better efficacité (600 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS2 12% better weight (15.0 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 183% more heat output (4,094 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 44% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS2 | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$6,025 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$7,050 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$8,075 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS2 or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS2 or Iceriver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS2 or the Iceriver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS2 and Iceriver KS3M on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 33.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (600 vs 567 J/TH).