IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 375.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W) in the Goldshell KA BOX Pro's favour. The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3L and Goldshell KA BOX Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3L 213% more hashrate (5.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 41% better efficacité (640 vs 375 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 82% better weight (14.4 vs 2.6 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 433% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 61% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$1.38 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$634 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$1,138 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$1,643 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX Pro375.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS3L or the Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3L or Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3L vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH — a difference of 265.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficacité (640 vs 375 J/TH).