IceRiver KS3L vs Bitmain KAS KS7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,080 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 77.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 16.4 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,509 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Bitmain KAS KS7
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain KAS KS7 l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 88% better efficacité (640.0 vs 77.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3L and Bitmain KAS KS7 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain KAS KS7 700% more hashrate (5.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 4% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,080 W)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 88% better efficacité (640.0 vs 77.0 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 12% better weight (14.4 vs 16.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 4% more heat output (10,918 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,590 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$5.95 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$3,763 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$5,935 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$8,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain KAS KS777.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3L vs Bitmain KAS KS7: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain KAS KS7 is more profitable at $-5.95/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3L or the Bitmain KAS KS7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS3L or the Bitmain KAS KS7?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3L and Bitmain KAS KS7 on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH — a difference of 563.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficacité (640.0 vs 77.0 J/TH).