IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS2 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 63% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,200 W) in the Iceriver KS2's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS3L isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3L 150% more hashrate (5.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 63% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KS2 6% better efficacité (640 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3L 3% better weight (14.4 vs 14.9 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 167% more heat output (10,918 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 25% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$10,238 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$15,713 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KS2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3L or the Iceriver KS2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS3L or the Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KS2?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 40.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (640 vs 600 J/TH).