iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) vs Goldshell KD6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) | Specification | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 25.3 TH/s |
| 170 W | Consommation électrique | 2,300 W |
| 48.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 580 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,848 BTU/hr |
| 68/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Goldshell KD6-SE
Based on BTC price of $76,896 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 93% better power draw (170 vs 2,300 W). The Goldshell KD6-SE claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) and Goldshell KD6-SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD6-SE 623% more hashrate (3.5 vs 25.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 93% better power draw (170 vs 2,300 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 47% better efficacité (48.6 vs 90.9 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 100% better weight (2.2 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 1253% more heat output (580 vs 7,848 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 162% more score de minage domestique (68.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) | Metric | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,016 |
| -$0.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.62 |
| -$104 | Net after 1 year | -$2,704 |
| -$207 | Net after 2 years | -$4,392 |
| -$311 | Net after 3 years | -$6,080 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)Score: 68/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)48.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-4.62/day for the Goldshell KD6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) or the Goldshell KD6-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD6-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) or the Goldshell KD6-SE?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) scores 68/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell KD6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) vs Goldshell KD6-SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) runs at 48.6 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6-SE runs at 90.9 J/TH — a difference of 42.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (48.6 vs 90.9 J/TH).