iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.5 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 170 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 48.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 580 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 68/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Based on BTC price of $77,040 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 95% better power draw (3,200 vs 170 W). That said, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 814% more hashrate (32.0 vs 3.5 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 95% better power draw (3,200 vs 170 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 51% better efficacité (100.0 vs 48.6 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 100% better weight (12,200.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 1782% more heat output (10,918 vs 580 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 209% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 68.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.55 | Daily net profit | -$0.28 |
| -$3,639 | Net after 1 year | -$104 |
| -$6,028 | Net after 2 years | -$207 |
| -$8,417 | Net after 3 years | -$311 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)Score: 68/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)48.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-6.55/day for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-K1 Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) scores 68/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 Max and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) runs at 48.6 J/TH — a difference of 51.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficacité (100.0 vs 48.6 J/TH).