iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Specification | iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.5 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Consommation électrique | 170 W |
| 363.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 48.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 9,900.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 580 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 68/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N1
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Based on BTC price of $77,087 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 93% better power draw (2,400 vs 170 W). The iBeLink BM-N1 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-N1 89% more hashrate (6.6 vs 3.5 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 93% better power draw (2,400 vs 170 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 87% better efficacité (363.6 vs 48.6 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 100% better weight (9,900.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N1 1312% more heat output (8,189 vs 580 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 162% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 68.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)Score: 68/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)48.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-5.53/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N1 or iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) scores 68/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)?
The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) runs at 48.6 J/TH — a difference of 315.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (363.6 vs 48.6 J/TH).