iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 TH/s |
| 185 W | Consommation électrique | 295 W |
| 142.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 631 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 37% better power draw (185 vs 295 W). The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) holds the edge in hashrate and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 38% more hashrate (1.3 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 37% better power draw (185 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 13% better efficacité (142 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 59% more heat output (631 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 3% more score de minage domestique (33.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$0.40 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$145 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$290 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$435 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-0.64/day for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 21.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (142 vs 164 J/TH).