Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitfily Snow Panther B1 | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 114.0 TH/s |
| 1,380 W | Consommation électrique | 3,306 W |
| 86.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,500.0 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 4,709 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitfily | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M50 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 613% more hashrate (16.0 vs 114.0 TH/s). The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 and Whatsminer M50 sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50 613% more hashrate (16.0 vs 114.0 TH/s)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 58% better power draw (1,380 vs 3,306 W)
- Whatsminer M50 66% better efficacité (86.3 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50 100% better weight (4,500.0 vs 12.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50 140% more heat output (4,709 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitfily Snow Panther B1 | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.83 |
| -$999 | Net after 1 year | -$3,998 |
| -$1,997 | Net after 2 years | -$5,397 |
| -$2,996 | Net after 3 years | -$6,795 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M5029.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Whatsminer M50: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.83/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 or Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 or the Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitfily Snow Panther B1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 and Whatsminer M50 on J/TH?
The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 runs at 86.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 57.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 66% better efficacité (86.3 vs 29.0 J/TH).