iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4 BRICK
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 65.0 MH/s |
| 1,240 W | Consommation électrique | 30 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 4,800.0 kg |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 102 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
Jasminer X4 BRICK
Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X4 BRICK l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 98% better power draw (1,240.0 vs 30.0 W). The iPollo V1 Classic claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4 BRICK sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V1 Classic 2285% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 98% better power draw (1,240.0 vs 30.0 W)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 42% better efficacité (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 63% better weight (13,000 vs 4,800 kg)
- iPollo V1 Classic 4032% more heat output (4,231 vs 102 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 23% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $107 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.07 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$133 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$159 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$186 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4 BRICKScore: 38/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4 BRICK461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4 BRICK more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 BRICK is more profitable at $-0.07/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4 BRICK: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4 BRICK?
The Jasminer X4 BRICK scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4 BRICK on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 BRICK runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 338,461.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH).