iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 840.0 MH/s |
| 104 W | Consommation électrique | 340 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 404,761.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 355 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,160 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Based on BTC price of $78,155 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4 3U-Z, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 546% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X4 3U-Z's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini Classic holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4 3U-Z sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 546% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 69% better power draw (104 vs 340 W)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 49% better efficacité (800,000 vs 404,762 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 99% better weight (1,000.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 227% more heat output (355 vs 1,160 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 13% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| $285 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,299 |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$0.82 |
| -$376 | Net after 1 year | -$1,597 |
| -$467 | Net after 2 years | -$1,895 |
| -$558 | Net after 3 years | -$2,192 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4 3U-ZScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4 3U-Z404,761.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4 3U-Z more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-0.82/day for the Jasminer X4 3U-Z. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4 3U-Z?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4 3U-Z?
The Jasminer X4 3U-Z scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 3U-Z runs at 404,761.9 J/TH — a difference of 395,238.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (800,000 vs 404,762 J/TH).