iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-C 1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4-C 1U |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 450.0 MH/s |
| 104 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 533,333.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 355 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Jasminer X4-C 1U
Based on BTC price of $78,155 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X4-C 1U l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 246% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4-C 1U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 246% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 57% better power draw (104 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 33% better efficacité (800,000 vs 533,333 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 131% more heat output (355 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 3% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4-C 1U |
|---|---|---|
| $285 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $658 |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$376 | Net after 1 year | -$868 |
| -$467 | Net after 2 years | -$1,078 |
| -$558 | Net after 3 years | -$1,289 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4-C 1UScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-C 1U533,333.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or the Jasminer X4-C 1U?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-0.58/day for the Jasminer X4-C 1U. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4-C 1U?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4-C 1U?
The Jasminer X4-C 1U scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4-C 1U on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-C 1U runs at 533,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 266,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (800,000 vs 533,333 J/TH).