Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Aisen A1 Pro

Aisen A1 Pro

Hashrate 23.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 95.7 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH

Aisen A1 Pro vs Avalon A1566

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Aisen A1 Pro Specification Avalon A1566
23.0 TH/s Hashrate 185.0 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 3,420 W
95.7 J/TH Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 14.9 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,669 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Aisen Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Aisen A1 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001058 BTC $0.84
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$4.44
Monthly -$133.30
Yearly -$1,621.81

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.73
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.48
Monthly -$44.34
Yearly -$539.50

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Avalon A1566 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 704% more hashrate (23.0 vs 185.0 TH/s). The Aisen A1 Pro claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1566 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Aisen A1 Pro and Avalon A1566 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1566 704% more hashrate (23.0 vs 185.0 TH/s)
  • Aisen A1 Pro 36% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,420 W)
  • Avalon A1566 81% better efficiency (95.7 vs 18.5 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1566 55% more heat output (7,506 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1566 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Aisen A1 Pro Metric Avalon A1566
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,500
-$4.44 Daily net profit -$1.48
-$1,622 Net after 1 year -$6,039
-$3,244 Net after 2 years -$6,579
-$4,865 Net after 3 years -$7,118
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1566

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Aisen A1 Pro or the Avalon A1566?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-1.48/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Avalon A1566: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Avalon A1566 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Aisen A1 Pro or the Avalon A1566?

The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Aisen A1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Avalon A1566: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 77.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (95.7 vs 18.5 J/TH).