Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Hashrate 1.5 GH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 43T

Innosilicon T3 43T

Hashrate 43.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 48.8 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3 43T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification Innosilicon T3 43T
1.5 GH/s Hashrate 43.0 TH/s
2,350 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 48.8 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 10,000.0 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

Innosilicon T3 43T

Daily Revenue 0.00002041 BTC $1.62
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$3.42
Monthly -$102.62
Yearly -$1,248.55

Based on BTC price of $79,356 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Innosilicon T3 43T edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (1,566,666.7 vs 48.8 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 43T — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon T3 43T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T3 43T 2866567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 43.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3 43T 11% better power draw (2,350 vs 2,100 W)
  • Innosilicon T3 43T 100% better efficiency (1,566,666.7 vs 48.8 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 12% more heat output (8,018 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric Innosilicon T3 43T
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,500
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$3.42
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$2,749
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$3,997
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$5,246
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 43T

48.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Innosilicon T3 43T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T3 43T is more profitable at $-3.42/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3 43T: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3 43T: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Innosilicon T3 43T?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 43T runs at 48.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,566,617.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,566,666.7 vs 48.8 J/TH).