Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Specification | Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| 750.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.5 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,350 W |
| 1,800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,566,666.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,018 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 43% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,350 W)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 13% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 1,566,667 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 74% more heat output (4,606 vs 8,018 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) | Metric | Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| $800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$3.24 | Daily net profit | -$5.64 |
| -$1,983 | Net after 1 year | -$3,259 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$5,317 |
| -$4,348 | Net after 3 years | -$7,376 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)1,566,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) is more profitable at $-3.24/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 233,333.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 1,566,667 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster
