Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-Q pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.1 GH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 520 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 253,658.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,774 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Based on BTC price of $70,519 and current network difficulty as of Mar 24, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-Q pro wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-Q proScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X16-Q pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q pro is more profitable at $-1.25/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,313,008.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster