Jasminer X16-Q pro vs Jasminer X4
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q pro | Specification | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s |
| 520 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 253,658.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 480,000.0 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,774 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Jasminer X4
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-Q pro wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 57% better power draw (520 vs 1,200 W). The Jasminer X4 claws back ground on price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Jasminer X16-Q pro and Jasminer X4 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X4 22% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 57% better power draw (520 vs 1,200 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 47% better efficiency (253,659 vs 480,000 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 131% more heat output (1,774 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q pro | Metric | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,249 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$1.25 | Daily net profit | -$2.88 |
| -$1,704 | Net after 1 year | -$2,050 |
| -$2,160 | Net after 2 years | -$3,101 |
| -$2,615 | Net after 3 years | -$4,153 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-Q proScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasminer X16-Q pro vs Jasminer X4: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q pro is more profitable at $-1.25/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Jasminer X4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Jasminer X16-Q pro or the Jasminer X4 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Jasminer X16-Q pro vs Jasminer X4: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Jasminer X16-Q pro and Jasminer X4 on J/TH?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 226,341.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficiency (253,659 vs 480,000 J/TH).