Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X16-P

Jasminer X16-P

Hashrate 5.8 GH/s Power 1,900 W Efficiency 327,586.2 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X4

Jasminer X4

Hashrate 2.5 GH/s Power 1,200 W Efficiency 480,000.0 J/TH

Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X4

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X16-P Specification Jasminer X4
5.8 GH/s Hashrate 2.5 GH/s
1,900 W Power Consumption 1,200 W
327,586.2 J/TH Efficiency 480,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
14.0 kg Weight
6,483 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,094 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm Etchash
Jasminer Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X16-P

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$4.56
Daily Profit -$4.56
Monthly -$136.79
Yearly -$1,664.32

Jasminer X4

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.40
Yearly -$1,051.17

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-P comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 132% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Jasminer X4 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Jasminer X16-P — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Jasminer X16-P and Jasminer X4 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Jasminer X16-P 132% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X4 37% better power draw (1,900 vs 1,200 W)
  • Jasminer X16-P 32% better efficiency (327,586 vs 480,000 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X16-P 58% more heat output (6,483 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X4 11% more home mining score (28.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Jasminer X16-P Metric Jasminer X4
$2,550 Upfront cost (MSRP) $999
-$4.56 Daily net profit -$2.88
-$4,214 Net after 1 year -$2,050
-$5,879 Net after 2 years -$3,101
-$7,543 Net after 3 years -$4,153
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X4

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-P

327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-P or the Jasminer X4?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 is more profitable at $-2.88/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-P or Jasminer X4?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X4: which fits a residential setup better?

The Jasminer X4 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X4: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 152,413.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficiency (327,586 vs 480,000 J/TH).