Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s |
| 620 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 480,000.0 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | — |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
Jasminer X4
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 48% better power draw (620 vs 1,200 W). That said, the Jasminer X4 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X4 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X4 28% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 48% better power draw (620 vs 1,200 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 34% better efficiency (317,949 vs 480,000 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 94% more heat output (2,115 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| $789 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.88 |
| -$1,332 | Net after 1 year | -$2,050 |
| -$1,875 | Net after 2 years | -$3,101 |
| -$2,418 | Net after 3 years | -$4,153 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X4?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Jasminer X4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or Jasminer X4?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X4 on J/TH?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 162,051.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficiency (317,949 vs 480,000 J/TH).