Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X16-QE

Jasminer X16-QE

Hashrate 1.8 GH/s Power 550 W Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X4

Jasminer X4

Hashrate 2.5 GH/s Power 1,200 W Efficiency 480,000.0 J/TH

Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X4

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X16-QE Specification Jasminer X4
1.8 GH/s Hashrate 2.5 GH/s
550 W Power Consumption 1,200 W
314,285.7 J/TH Efficiency 480,000.0 J/TH
40 dB Noise Level
10.0 kg Weight
1,877 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,094 BTU/hr
65/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm Etchash
Jasminer Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X16-QE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.32
Daily Profit -$1.32
Monthly -$39.60
Yearly -$481.78

Jasminer X4

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.40
Yearly -$1,051.17

Based on BTC price of $78,167 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-QE edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 54% better power draw (550 vs 1,200 W) in the Jasminer X16-QE's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Jasminer X16-QE — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-QE and Jasminer X4 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Jasminer X4 43% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 54% better power draw (550 vs 1,200 W)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 35% better efficiency (314,286 vs 480,000 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X4 118% more heat output (1,877 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Jasminer X16-QE Metric Jasminer X4
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP) $999
-$1.32 Daily net profit -$2.88
-$951 Net after 1 year -$2,050
-$1,433 Net after 2 years -$3,101
-$1,914 Net after 3 years -$4,153
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-QE

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-QE

314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X4: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Jasminer X4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Jasminer X16-QE or the Jasminer X4 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X4: which fits a residential setup better?

The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X4: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 165,714.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficiency (314,286 vs 480,000 J/TH).