Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X16-Q

Jasminer X16-Q

Hashrate 1,950.0 MH/s Power 620 W Efficiency 317,948.7 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X16-QE

Jasminer X16-QE

Hashrate 1.8 GH/s Power 550 W Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH

Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-QE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X16-Q Specification Jasminer X16-QE
1,950.0 MH/s Hashrate 1.8 GH/s
620 W Power Consumption 550 W
317,948.7 J/TH Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH
40 dB Noise Level 40 dB
10.0 kg Weight 10.0 kg
2,115 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,877 BTU/hr
65/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Jasminer Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X16-Q

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$1.49
Monthly -$44.64
Yearly -$543.09

Jasminer X16-QE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.32
Daily Profit -$1.32
Monthly -$39.60
Yearly -$481.78

Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-QE edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 11% better power draw (620 vs 550 W). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Jasminer X16-QE — wins on 3 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X16-QE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Jasminer X16-Q 11% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 11% better power draw (620 vs 550 W)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 1% better efficiency (317,949 vs 314,286 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X16-Q 13% more heat output (2,115 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Jasminer X16-Q Metric Jasminer X16-QE
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $469
-$1.49 Daily net profit -$1.32
-$4,043 Net after 1 year -$951
-$4,586 Net after 2 years -$1,433
-$5,129 Net after 3 years -$1,914
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-QE

314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X16-QE?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X16-QE better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-QE: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X16-QE?

The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 3,663.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficiency (317,949 vs 314,286 J/TH).