Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-QE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 GH/s |
| 620 W | Power Consumption | 550 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 314,285.7 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,877 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
Jasminer X16-QE
Based on BTC price of $78,167 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-QE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 11% better power draw (620 vs 550 W). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X16-QE sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 11% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-QE 11% better power draw (620 vs 550 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 1% better efficiency (317,949 vs 314,286 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 13% more heat output (2,115 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | Jasminer X16-QE |
|---|---|---|
| $789 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $469 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$1,332 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$1,875 | Net after 2 years | -$1,433 |
| -$2,418 | Net after 3 years | -$1,914 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Jasminer X16-Q or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X16-QE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-QE: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X16-QE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 3,663.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficiency (317,949 vs 314,286 J/TH).