Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-P | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 GH/s | Hashrate | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 1,900 W | Power Consumption | 620 W |
| 327,586.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,483 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-P
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-Q, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 67% better power draw (1,900 vs 620 W). That said, the Jasminer X16-P isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Jasminer X16-P and Jasminer X16-Q diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X16-P 197% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 67% better power draw (1,900 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 3% better efficiency (327,586 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-P 206% more heat output (6,483 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 132% more home mining score (28.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-P | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $2,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$4.56 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$4,214 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$5,879 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$7,543 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Jasminer X16-P or Jasminer X16-Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X16-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Jasminer X16-P or the Jasminer X16-Q?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X16-Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 9,637.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (327,586 vs 317,949 J/TH).