Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 840.0 MH/s |
| 620 W | Power Consumption | 340 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 404,761.9 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,160 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 132% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Jasminer X4 3U-Z claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Jasminer X16-Q and Jasminer X4 3U-Z diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X16-Q 132% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 45% better power draw (620 vs 340 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 21% better efficiency (317,949 vs 404,762 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 17% better weight (10.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-Q 82% more heat output (2,115 vs 1,160 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 91% more home mining score (65.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,299 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.82 |
| -$4,043 | Net after 1 year | -$1,597 |
| -$4,586 | Net after 2 years | -$1,895 |
| -$5,129 | Net after 3 years | -$2,192 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X4 3U-Z?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 3U-Z is more profitable at $-0.82/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Jasminer X16-Q or the Jasminer X4 3U-Z better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4 3U-Z at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Jasminer X4 3U-Z). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Jasminer X16-Q vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 3U-Z runs at 404,761.9 J/TH — a difference of 86,813.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (317,949 vs 404,762 J/TH).