Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 500.0 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Power Consumption | 8,400 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 28,661 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 273% more hashrate (134 vs 500 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 273% more hashrate (134 vs 500 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 66% better power draw (2,881 vs 8,400 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 22% better efficiency (21.5 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 28% better weight (14.4 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 192% more heat output (9,830 vs 28,661 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 132% more home mining score (22.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.04 | Daily net profit | -$1.96 |
| -$1,227 | Net after 1 year | -$716 |
| -$1,970 | Net after 2 years | -$1,432 |
| -$2,714 | Net after 3 years | -$2,148 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500TScore: 51/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T is more profitable at $-1.96/day compared to $-2.04/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 4.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficiency (21.5 vs 16.8 J/TH).