Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Ebang Ebit E10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E10 |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 18.0 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Power Consumption | 1,650 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 9,800.0 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,630 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Ebang Ebit E10
Based on BTC price of $79,126 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 644% more hashrate (134.0 vs 18.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E10 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Ebang Ebit E10 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 644% more hashrate (134.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E10 43% better power draw (2,881 vs 1,650 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 77% better efficiency (21.5 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 100% better weight (14.4 vs 9,800.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 75% more heat output (9,830 vs 5,630 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E10 27% more home mining score (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E10 |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.04 | Daily net profit | -$3.30 |
| -$1,226 | Net after 1 year | -$1,206 |
| -$1,969 | Net after 2 years | -$2,412 |
| -$2,711 | Net after 3 years | -$3,619 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E10Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Ebang Ebit E10 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-2.04/day compared to $-3.30/day for the Ebang Ebit E10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the Ebang Ebit E10 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Ebang Ebit E10?
The Ebang Ebit E10 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Ebang Ebit E10?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E10 runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 70.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (21.5 vs 91.7 J/TH).