Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9.2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9.2 |
|---|---|---|
| 358.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 5,370 W | Power Consumption | 1,320 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 110.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 18,322 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,504 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)
Ebang Ebit E9.2
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 2883% more hashrate (358.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). That said, the Ebang Ebit E9.2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) and Ebang Ebit E9.2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 2883% more hashrate (358.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9.2 75% better power draw (5,370 vs 1,320 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 86% better efficiency (15.0 vs 110.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 100% better weight (12.8 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 307% more heat output (18,322 vs 4,504 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 42% more home mining score (44.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9.2 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,757 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| $0.15 | Daily net profit | -$2.73 |
| -$2,702 | Net after 1 year | -$997 |
| -$2,647 | Net after 2 years | -$1,994 |
| -$2,592 | Net after 3 years | -$2,990 |
| Takes ~50.2 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)$2.88/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9.2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) is more profitable at $0.15/day compared to $-2.73/day for the Ebang Ebit E9.2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9.2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9.2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9.2?
The Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9.2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) and Ebang Ebit E9.2?
The Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9.2 runs at 110.0 J/TH — a difference of 95.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (15.0 vs 110.0 J/TH).