Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs NerdQAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) | Specification | NerdQAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 368.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 4,080 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| 11.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 17.2 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 13,921 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 273 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)
NerdQAxe
Based on BTC price of $79,007 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 18300% more hashrate (368.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). That said, the NerdQAxe isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) and NerdQAxe actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 18300% more hashrate (368.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- NerdQAxe 98% better power draw (4,080.0 vs 80.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 72% better efficiency (11.1 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- NerdQAxe 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- NerdQAxe 98% better weight (17.2 vs 0.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) 4999% more heat output (13,921 vs 273 BTU/hr)
- NerdQAxe 137% more home mining score (30.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) | Metric | NerdQAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $5,899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $249 |
| $3.59 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$4,590 | Net after 1 year | -$293 |
| -$3,280 | Net after 2 years | -$336 |
| -$1,971 | Net after 3 years | -$380 |
| Takes ~4.5 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)$3.71/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
NerdQAxeScore: 71/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)11.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) or NerdQAxe more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) is more profitable at $3.59/day compared to $-0.12/day for the NerdQAxe. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) or the NerdQAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdQAxe is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) or the NerdQAxe?
The NerdQAxe scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) and NerdQAxe on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) runs at 11.1 J/TH while the NerdQAxe runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 28.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficiency (11.1 vs 40.0 J/TH).
Compare Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) with...
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs Antminer AL1
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs Antminer D7
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs Antminer D9
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs Antminer E9 Pro
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs Antminer K7
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (368Th) vs Antminer KS3
