Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Hashrate 2.7 TH/s Power 697 W Efficiency 258.2 J/TH
VS
NerdQAxe++

NerdQAxe++

Hashrate 4.0 TH/s Power 120 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN vs NerdQAxe++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN Specification NerdQAxe++
2.7 TH/s Hashrate 4.0 TH/s
697 W Power Consumption 120 W
258.2 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
Noise Level 42 dB
7,500.0 kg Weight 0.5 kg
2,378 BTU/hr BTU Output 409 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 58/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Daily Revenue 0.00000124 BTC $0.10
Daily Electricity -$1.67
Daily Profit -$1.57
Monthly -$47.23
Yearly -$574.68

NerdQAxe++

Daily Revenue 0.00000184 BTC $0.15
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.14
Monthly -$4.27
Yearly -$51.95

Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the NerdQAxe++, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 88% better efficiency (258.2 vs 30.0 J/TH) in the NerdQAxe++'s favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: NerdQAxe++ — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN and NerdQAxe++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • NerdQAxe++ 48% more hashrate (2.7 vs 4.0 TH/s)
  • NerdQAxe++ 83% better power draw (697 vs 120 W)
  • NerdQAxe++ 88% better efficiency (258.2 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • NerdQAxe++ 100% better weight (7,500.0 vs 0.5 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 481% more heat output (2,378 vs 409 BTU/hr)
  • NerdQAxe++ 93% more home mining score (30.0 vs 58.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN Metric NerdQAxe++
Upfront cost (MSRP) $349
-$1.57 Daily net profit -$0.14
-$575 Net after 1 year -$401
-$1,149 Net after 2 years -$453
-$1,724 Net after 3 years -$505
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdQAxe++

Score: 58/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdQAxe++

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or NerdQAxe++ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe++ is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-1.57/day for the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or NerdQAxe++?

The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or NerdQAxe++?

The NerdQAxe++ scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN and NerdQAxe++ on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN runs at 258.2 J/TH while the NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 228.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficiency (258.2 vs 30.0 J/TH).