NerdOctaxe Gamma vs NerdQAxe++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| NerdOctaxe Gamma | Specification | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.0 TH/s |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 42 dB |
| 0.8 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 682 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 409 BTU/hr |
| 61/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
NerdOctaxe Gamma
NerdQAxe++
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the NerdOctaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% more hashrate (8.0 vs 4.0 TH/s) in the NerdOctaxe Gamma's favour. That said, the NerdQAxe++ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The NerdOctaxe Gamma and NerdQAxe++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 100% more hashrate (8.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- NerdQAxe++ 40% better power draw (200 vs 120 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 17% better efficiency (25.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- NerdQAxe++ 7% better noise (45.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- NerdQAxe++ 38% better weight (0.8 vs 0.5 kg)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 67% more heat output (682 vs 409 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 5% more home mining score (61.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| NerdOctaxe Gamma | Metric | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| $599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $349 |
| -$0.19 | Daily net profit | -$0.14 |
| -$669 | Net after 1 year | -$402 |
| -$739 | Net after 2 years | -$454 |
| -$810 | Net after 3 years | -$507 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the NerdOctaxe Gamma or NerdQAxe++ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe++ is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-0.19/day for the NerdOctaxe Gamma. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
NerdOctaxe Gamma vs NerdQAxe++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the NerdOctaxe Gamma at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
NerdOctaxe Gamma vs NerdQAxe++: which fits a residential setup better?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 58/100 for the NerdQAxe++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
NerdOctaxe Gamma vs NerdQAxe++: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH while the NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (25.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).