Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M32 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 62.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,348 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 54.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,423 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
MicroBT Whatsminer M32
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT Whatsminer M32, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 377% more hashrate (13.0 vs 62.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M32 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M32 377% more hashrate (13.0 vs 62.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 61% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,348 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M32 46% better efficiency (100.0 vs 54.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M32 158% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,423 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M32 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,105 |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$5.78 |
| -$1,031 | Net after 1 year | -$7,215 |
| -$1,997 | Net after 2 years | -$9,325 |
| -$2,964 | Net after 3 years | -$11,434 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M3254.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M32?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-5.78/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M32. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M32). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 runs at 54.0 J/TH — a difference of 46.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficiency (100.0 vs 54.0 J/TH).