Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Whatsminer M56
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Whatsminer M56 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 194.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Power Consumption | 5,550 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.6 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,937 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Whatsminer M56
Based on BTC price of $79,163 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M56 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 1517% more hashrate (12.0 vs 194.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M56's favour. That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Whatsminer M56 sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M56 1517% more hashrate (12.0 vs 194.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 80% better power draw (1,100 vs 5,550 W)
- Whatsminer M56 69% better efficiency (91.7 vs 28.6 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M56 23% better noise (65.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 73% better weight (3.5 vs 13.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M56 405% more heat output (3,753 vs 18,937 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 18% more home mining score (52.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Whatsminer M56 |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$2.19 | Daily net profit | -$6.03 |
| -$1,149 | Net after 1 year | -$7,202 |
| -$1,948 | Net after 2 years | -$9,403 |
| -$2,747 | Net after 3 years | -$11,605 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M5628.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Whatsminer M56: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.19/day compared to $-6.03/day for the Whatsminer M56. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or Whatsminer M56?
The Whatsminer M56 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Whatsminer M56: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Whatsminer M56). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Whatsminer M56?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Whatsminer M56 runs at 28.6 J/TH — a difference of 63.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (91.7 vs 28.6 J/TH).